SAKSHATKARA, WHAT IT IS
Sakshatkara
means literally seeing with ones eyes,—direct perception through the senses.
Sakshatkara of God is thus " seeing God." To persons having no actual
experience of such states and unfamiliar with or having poor belief in the
literature on the subject, the question occurs immediately, "Is it
possible?" But to many others, the question will be "Can -any one
doubt it?" Doubt arises in this matter mainly by reason of the definition
given of "God." This widely used term is used in a number of senses.
To abstract philosophy, the term Brahman found in the Indian Scriptures and:
often translated by the English word God is an abstract impersonal principle
called sometimes the Impersonal Absolute. Of course, Sakshatkar of the above sort
is Impossible of an abstract or Impersonal Absolute. But the same term Brahman
found in the Vedas and other holy works is treated by Dwaities, Visihtadwaitis,
etc., as referring to a personal being, viz., God. And they all claim that
Sakshatkara is obtained of such Brahman or God. Many maintain that Brahman or
God reconciles within itself apparently conflicting characteristics and declare
that God (Brahman) is both personal and impersonal, either at different times
or at the same time. To these also, Sakshatkara of God is possible.
The distinction
between God and Gods is closely connected with the distinctions drawn in the
above paragraphs. Gods are numerous entities with characteristics or qualities
based upon a preponderance of Satva over Rajas, and Tamas; and they have
distinct forms, features, a fixed number of limbs and faces weapons and
ornaments, and have particular Divine realms for their usual residence and some
particular creatures to ride on. Their forms are not visible to ordinary men on
earth, but are always rendered visible and serviceable if particular
invocations, Mantras, ceremonies etc., are adopted, i.e., they become subjects
of Sakshatkara. In the case of God, the matter of Sakshatkara is not quite so
simple. Yet even among Monotheists relying upon Personal God, Sakshatkara
becomes possible by reason of the Personality of God. Personality generally implies
form, colour, size, and other peculiarities of human persons. Hence even
those stressing the Nirakara (Formless) character of God
in their theory or
doctrines concede in their practice
all the above features of
personality in the accounts given of
God's dealings with men. God walks and
talks with some patriarchs, dictates his commandments, leads his chosen people by
appearing in the form of a moving column of fire in a bush, and thunders fort the words "This is my son in whom I am well pleased. Heal
ye him." |
The
widespread belief amongst all
religionists in Sakshatkara is based
largely upon accounts given in
their scriptures and the history of
their saints. There are also
notable instances of present day saints who enjoy or exhibit
Sakshatkaric phenomenal Those who are aware of these find in them a great
corroboration of the accounts given in the
scriptures and saintly
biographic. To those who
disbelieve all these,
it is possible to furnish——
arguments and evidence to counteract their disbelief. But it is outside the scope of this article to furnish such arguments and evidence. If any
disbeliever is anxious sincerely to get some proof, the same may be
furnished later on, especially
in that portion dealing with directions
given hereunder in later issues for obtaining Sakshatkara.
We shall now
consider what it is that is called
Sakshatkara and shall use materials from scriptures, saintly biographies, and present day experiences, for this purpose. Even
among those who do not accept the former
two, many may find adequate!
reason for accepting the last class. Sakshatkara i.-e: "seeing
God admits of the following classification :—. Seeing God e.g. Mah Vishnu in
Vaikunta or on the Milky Ocean,—securing that favour by prayers. Thus, Brahma
in Srimat Bhagavata proceeds to the
shore of the milky ocean and obtains by prayer a sight of Sriman Narayana.
Similarly, seeing Gods in their
various lokas by prayer, etc. 2.
Obtaining the sudden appearance of God or Ishtamurthy on
Earth after Yaga or Yegna, Dhyana and
Tapas. Thus the king Nabhi conducts a Putrakameshti Yaga through his
ritviks; and God Narayana appears on the
sacrificial ground and grants him his prayer, adding that he (Narayana) would be born as his son. Dhruva's Tapas and
Dhyana resulted in Maha
Vishnu's sudden appearance before
him, and granting him the Dhruva Pada, far above
the object with which he started his Tapas. Ravivarma's pictures of
Dhruva's penance and
other Sakshatkaras granted to Gajendra
etc., will be easily remembered and in
fact form very useful and
excellent help to the
-ardent aspirant for Sakshatkara.
These are all good
illustrations of Sakshatkara of this class.
Thirdly the inference and
appearance of God in certain forms and
objects admits of a differentiation
between times and states when
Sakshatkara is present and when it
is not. Incarations like Rama and Krishna are believed to
be the appearance of God on earth. Yet all
persons who saw
Rama and Krishna are not said
to have Sakshatkara. These were born of human mothers, led the life
of human beings
and ordinarily are seen as mere
human beings. So
when the playmates of Krishna saw him, it was not
Sakshatkara. But when Arjuna asked him to show himself as all
creation and Krishna
showed his Virat Rupam (Chapter
X of Bhagavat Gita) that was
Sakshatkara. When Vamana i.e.
(Hari in the form of Vamana) went to
Bali's Yagasala and begged for three
feet of earth, it was not Sakshatkara even
though Sukracharya informed Bali that
Vamana was but God. When
however, Vamana assumed the
Trivikrama form and measured the
whole of Universe in two foot
steps, he then showed Sakshatkara.
The sacred
stone or other image into which God is invoked by appropriate Mantras and
ceremonies, in temples or at home, is undoubtedly believed to be God with all
sincerity by the worshippers, but the worshipper's daily seeing the
idol so believed in is not Sakshatkara. If however, under special circumstances,
the--worshipper sees not the dead and inanimate stone or other image, but a
living figure moving and talking in divine fashion, that is Sakshatkara. When
Namadev worshipped Vittal image and placed before it Nivedya and prayed the God
to eat, it was not Sakshatkara that he enjoyed. But when he cried and cried at
the God's contempt for him and unkind refusal to partake of the Nivedya, the
stone image turned into a living figure and ate up the entire plate of the
Nivedya; then it was that he enjoyed Sakshatkara. Such Sakshatkara Namadev frequently
enjoyed in his life for e.g., when Vittal assured him that he was only a Kaccha
and not a pucca devotee and that he should go to a Guru (Vishobha Kesar) and
when he appeared before him as a dog snatching away the chapatti from Namadev's
plate and later assumed the usual Vitobha form, there was Sakshatkara.
When Thyagaraja
worshipped daily his Rama Panchaya-thanam images which he fully believed to be
God, he was not having Sakshatkara. But when on occasions the metallic figures
or the Panchayathana exhibited life and the intelligence e.g., when Rama
ordered Bharata to hand over his whisk (Chamara) in his hand to Thyagaraja and
the same was done and Rama spoke to Thyagaraja other words alluded to in his (Thyagaraja) songs there was Sakshatkara. A holy saint like Rama
Krishna Paramahamsa is believed
by some of his devotees to be But even these persons when they
saw him daily were not having
Sakshatkara. When however, one day Mathurbabu saw him moving up and down in his
presence and in the
course of the walk was transformed
into the Shiva
form, that was Sak shatkara.
God is believed
to be within all objects, and in fact is. objects—Sarvam Vishnumayam Jagat. Yet
a man with firm belief in this statement sees objects and to his eye the object
appear merely as material objects; and seeing them thus is Sakshatkara. In
Dasganu's chapter on Venkusa's conform his grace on Sai Baba at the close of the
latter's novitiate, they Sai Baba looked at all objects and saw them as God and
as material objects. That was Sakshatkara.
A Narada
hears about the glorious
Mahavishnu with four arms, with his peetambara dress,
Chanku, Chakra, Gatha, Padi Kaustubhaand Srivatsa etc.; he loves the Mahavishnu
that is described and forms a
picture of that Vishnu
in his heart and intensely concentrates on the same; that does
not constitute Sakshatkara. But at one stage when the concentration was its greatest intensity and tears of joy flowed from his
eyes hair of his body stood on end, and all the other
Ashta Bhavas were manifested, he
had besides the image in his
heart, the living figure of the same God in front of him and for a time he great enjoyed that
appearance and thereafter that
figure vanish. This was a case
of Sakshatkara, Again when
another devotee of Mahavishnu
concentrated on the figure of
that Ishtamurthi standing
before Dhruva that Murthi appeared as a living figure, and pointed to another figure saying "This Sai Baba of Shirdi your man" "you must resort to
him" (see devotees
Experience Part 1 Page). This
was Sakshatkara. The above incidents
suffice to show the reader what is and
what is not, Saksh In short it
may be said that seeing or hearing any Avathar saint image or other holy objects will be considered as
Sakshatkara only if there are miraculous features about it.
We mav proceed to consider the.
value, utility, immediate and remoter, effects of such
Sakshatkara and also
notice the sadhana
prescribed for obtaining such Sakshalkara. These
will appear in subsequent issues.
(Its effects,
value and utility)
Before starting
part 2 it may be better to mention some items of Sakshatkara as they occurred
to Sai Bhaktas and were reported to Baba. H. S. Dikshit known as Kaka Dikshit
was living frequently for long periods at Shirdi with Baba in order to obtain
the fullest benefit, mainly spiritual and partly temporal of his contact. Baba
asked him to concentrate on Shrimat Bhagavata and Adyatmaramayana and to go on
with the usual worship of his images. A result of faithful adherence to Baba's
advice was Dikshit's gaining a Sakshatkara. One day after intense pooja when
Dikshit was still in the waking state he found a divine figure appearing before
him, but the phenomenon being totally new to him he could not say what the
Murthy was, whether it was Vittal that he ardently longed to see or anything
else. The same day a vendor of images came to him and showed him a Vittal image
that resembled the figure that appeared before him. When he (H. S. Dikshit)
went up to Baba, even before he opened his mouth to communicate his experience
or state his doubt as to the identity of the Murthy, Baba Himself broached the
subject. Baba had a peculiar manner of talking to a person about matters
pertaining to him so as to be understood only by the addressee and not by
others present (B.C.S. 130).
Baba——Did not
Vittal Patel come ? Have you not seen Him. That Vittal is very elusive, bind
him fast. If by inadvertence you lose sight of him, he will vanish in a second.
Baba thus confirmed Dikshit in 1.the reality of the Sakshatkara that he had
experienced that day and 2. the identity of the Murthy that appeared before him
with Vittal. Baba gave him the further information that Sakshatkaras of that
sort are very transient and very elusive and cannot possibly be held to be a
satisfactory end and aim of life. Life's aim should be permanent contact with
God. The elusive appearance must be made permanent by binding God's figure to
the heart permanently.
Such Sakshatkaras have filled others who did not enjoy the with envy or the spirit of emulation. Das Ganu was a Vark hari of Pandhurpur Vittal, making a prolonged pilgrim tour in Ashada Ashvini and Karthika along with crowds of other devotees from Alandi to Pandhurpur the abode of Vittal. He was longing to have a Darsan of Vittal but never had it. Once he went to Baba for Sakshatkara of Vittal. Das Ganu to Baba-want Sakshatkar, Baba, you ask me to make Sapthaha of Bhagavatha; but will you grant me Sakshatkara as a result of it Baba:—Vittal will appear. But there must be intense devotion (Bhava) Das Ganu read his Sapthaha of Bhagavatha but failed get Sakshatkara.
Das Ganu to Baba :— You promised me Sakshatkara, but have not got it.
Baba :—Wait you will have it. (Baba was
evidently waiting for development of the requisite faith and earnestness in Das
Ganu.) (B.C.S. 128.) In 1916, Bhadrapat, D.G. was keen going to Pandhurpur, but
N.G.C. took him to Shirdi and made him perform Keertanas and was for detaining
him there, eve for Asvin, evidently with Baba's assent, D.G. then though within
himself without saying it "How is he (Baba) a guru who blocks my way to
God (at Pandhurpur)".
Baba to Nana :—" Nana, do not
stop him from going to Pandhurpur.
.
Baba to Ganu :—"Go to
Pandhurpur.
So D.G. gladly went to Pandhurpur for
Asvin, as Vittal or Pandari alone was God to him and not Baba. Later he
returned to Shirdi. B.C.S. 129. Das Ganu to Baba:—"Baba, you have be long
putting off my request. When will you give me Sakshakara ? Baba to
D.G:—"You see me. That is Sakshatkara.I am God.
Das Ganu :—"I expected you
would say so. But I am not satisfied with that.
Das Ganu
considered that it was not in his destiny (Prarabdha) to have Sakshatkara of
God Vittal, as that was what he evidently wanted.
It is better at
this stage to introduce other very common and often misused religious expressions which are used more or less as
synonymous with sakshatkara:—namely the expressions mystic and mysticism. A
mystic is best described as one who has contacted the divine, that is something
beyond the world or ordinary experience and derived thereby exhilaration,
inspiration, and ineffable joy ; and mysticism is that experience. Seeing
Vittal as a living and moving form is both Sakshatkara and having mystic
experience. All sakshatkaris are mystics and perhaps all mystics might be termed
sakshatkaris whether of Eswara Sakshatkara or impersonal sakshatkaras.
Now for the question as to the effects,
value and utility of Eswara Sakehatkara, this question is hardly ever raised by
one who has actually seen the divine form- But it is sometimes raised by one
who has seen a vague form as in the following stanzas of the mystic, Coventry
Patmore which however furnish the answer.
What's that which, ere I spake, was gone
1
So joyful and intense a spark That,
whilst, o'erhead the wonder shone,
The day, before but dull, grew dark ?
I do not know, but this I know,
That, had the splendour lived a year, The
truth that 1 some heavenly show
Did see, could not be now more clear.
This know I too: might mortal breath
Express the passion then inspired, Evil
would die a natural death.
And nothing transient be desired.
And error from the soul would pass,
And leave the senses pure and strong
As sunbeams. But the best, alas, Has neither memory nor tongue !
Coventry
Patmore: Life of Life.
Some ardent devotees who enjoyed or enjoy
sakshatkara may Consider the above questions as meaningless and materialistic.
What is the goal of Life ? Most readers answer in the words of Sri Sai Baba
"Allah Milnar"—i.e., to reach and attain God or in the language of
religious books (God realisation). When a persoti yearning with a desire to
reach his Ishta Murthy concentrates oti his form vigorously, sooner or later he
sees that form. And if he is asked what is the effect of such sakshatkara he
might well answer the effect is supreme satisfaction. It is the attainment of
the Goal or at least the first rung of the ladder in the attainmen . Seeing God
is according to the popular conception the first ste t or requisite for
knowing God. And knowing God (Metaphysic t declares and proves) is identical
with being God or sayujyan . No doubt walking the first mile towards Kasi is
not the same i s being at Kasi. But many will feel after the accomplishment ( [
the first mile stone, an exhilaration much like the experienc s of the permanent
God Realisation:- In any case an extraordinar < exhilaration replete
with promise of supreme attainment. In the Bhagavatha, Sriman Narayana after
appearing (Sakshatkara) before Brahma and Dhruva says "All efforts and
anxieties cease with my appearance" and He is prepared to grant every boon
that may be desired.
This possibility of getting every
temporal or spiritual boon desired may seem to be the final goal. But so long
as there is any desire for objects temporal or spiritual, that proves that
attainment is not achieved; and in a number of cases after achieving
Sakshatkara the devotee prays to the Godhead that appears, for a number of
earthly objects. Vasudeva, Chitrakethu and Nabhi wanted only a son. The Gods
want that the Asura Vitra should be killed. It requires a considerable degree
of Vairagya and real wisdom to refuse to pray for any object or to pray for
perpetual Sakshatkara.
As for effects of Sakshatkara Ritwiks of
Nabhi say wisely that the very appearance of God before a devotee is very great
grace—evidently it being understood that the Sakshatkart would become permanent
and unending. The effects ofi
r
obtained. Next there is at least the
spiritual evolution result-
ooi«* * i i •*• * r
• fi from the momentary
contact with the divine, tven
persons, 'P appearance of God only in
dreams feel such an effect. They crcome irrational or irreligious
impulses and sentiments. A other of a Vaishnavite vakil noticed
that her son was beginning worship God
Subramania and reproved him for such hetero-t „ Imagine her surprise when
next she found that Sai Baba's
ortrait adorned his table. She then taunted him with having descended to the worship of a
Muhamadan. The vakil kept quiet. But the same night the pious lady had a dream
and therein she saw Mahavishnu with
peethamber surrounded by golden halo-She felt greatly elevated by the
appearance ; but looking at the face of Mahavishnu she saw it
was Sai Baba's face. To add to her surprise, Mahavishnu then spoke to her and said
"Look here, am I Muhamadan ?"
She felt sorry for rebuking
her son. Then the figure gradually
descended and finally disappeared in a big tomb which she had never seen. In the
morning her son showed her
Sai Baba's tomb at Shirdi from a book
and then she recognised the identity of
that with what she has seen at night. Sri mat Bhagavata and so many other puranas are brimful of
Sakshatkara and mention numerous and various effects of these.
Srimat Bhagavata especially deals frequently with the correct attitude towards
Sakshatkara. When one
has seen his Istamurthy he must
recognise that the goal has not
yet been achieved. Namadev who
saw and talked to Vittai frequently was told by the latter that the goal of
life had not yet been reached* and that the goal namely God
realisation required not
mere identification of one form (be it Vittai or anything else)
with the supreme but the
identification of all forms seen with that Supreme. The Bhagavat Gita stresses
the same truth frequently in words like these "Yomam Pasyathi
Sarvatra Sarvamcha mayi pasyati. Tasyaham napranasyami sa ch me napranasyati (2) Sarvabhoo tatma Bhootatma (3)
Sarva Bhootasthitam Bhajat Yekatvam asthitah Sarvatha Vartamanopi
Sayogimayi Vartate
The goal of God realisation even to a
sagunopasana Bhaktha oi tswara must necessarily be the eternal and endless
enjoyment of contact or identity with the Eternal, the Infinite, the Perfect
and such a supreme enjoyment or experience tends to transcend
Sakshatkara
even though transient, and though inferior are by no! the limits of personality
of the worshipped. In
some special means
negligible. In the first place the
worldly ends prayed for • Sakshatkara
for e.g. in the Srimat Bhagavatha
such truths art
stressed sometimes by showing that
several vicissitudes including
even janmas befall the devotee alter
obtaining bis first Sakshatl kara before mukthi or sayujya is reached. Nareda
after thi iigure of Narayana informed him that in the fleshy body that hi then
inhabited he could only have the transient Sakshatkan given to him as an
appetiser and for the ultimate permanent Sakshatkara he would have to wait for
the next janma. Accordingly Narada waited and in the subsequent janma he
enjoye* perpetual Sakshatkara.
As the Goal of life is the merger
in or permanent contacl
with the supreme its
achievement involves the
higher ancfl higher
development of the
Jeeva. A Sakshatkara comes ncl doubt to holy and
not unholy people. As Narayana says Narada "Avipakva Kashayanem
Durdharsoham Kuyoginamj i.e.
when a sadhaka or yogabhyasi has
not fully burnt
out hit evil vasanas nor
attained perfect equanimity of samatwa, thai__
Sadhaka's jeeva cannot see God (i.e. obtain Sakshatkara) Even^P though a
sadhaka like Narada in his previous birth may not havcl serious criminal or
sinful stains he has not obtained
supremeB serenity or samatva at the time of his first
Sakshatkara. ThJ sudden
disappearance of Narayana's form upsets
his serenit« and he is distressed.
When Narayana appears in S.B.
6-9 thefl gods heave with emotion. "Dristvatham avanow sarve Eksha-nahladaViklavah,
i.e. they were highly
excited by the joy ol_ seeing God. The goal however requires them to go throughH co-sphering with God
(Salokam). Sarupyam in attaining the
samel qualities (form) of God. Sarupyam immediate proximity or b'etnf on the
threshold of Divinity and
Sayujyam merger in
Him.1 Excitment cannot last even
in the first stage namely-Salokam J
The end is thus described in S.B. 5th Skanda 1 st chapter para 27™
This shows that tadhatmya of atman
without differentiatioi is the goal of Jeeva that starts its course with
Bhakthi. ^H
NARASIMHASWAMY. ^1
1
THE ULTIMATE SAKSHATKARA 1 DARSANAM
-BRAHMATMA
or
During most
stages of the spiritual quest, ideas of God, Iswara Brahman, Paramatma and of
oneself vary, change, and usually °et further and further refined; and there is
considerable variation fn the Sakshatkaras obtained therein by the Dvaithis
Visishtadvaithis ancj others on the saguna (or worship with form)
lines. All however enjoy a unique ineffable experience and all are decidedly the
better for it. Several may fancy that the course is over but the course is not
over. Alike from authority and from experience of great souls, there is no end
to one's spiritual course till he reaches the Divine permanently, that is, till
he is finally absorbed in the Divine—that is, till he attains Sayujyam
Kaivalyam or Moksham from which there is no return. Taking authorities first,
especially the Puranas stressing sakshathkaras attained by Saguna worship, for
example, Srimath Bhagavata Purana, we find it laid down that obtaining a
glimpse of a divine form and the temporary bliss resulting therefrom is not the
end or goal of life. Narada who obtained such a transitory sakshat-kara and
felt distressed at its loss was definitely informed that the temporary
sakshatkara was but an appetiser and he would have to wait for another janma in
which he would have perpetual Sakshathkara. There are several passages in the
Bhagavata stating that seeing the Divine in particular forms and adoring them
with Archanam, Vandanam, Dasyam and Sakyam will not be the end of the devotees'
career. The devotee may pray and insist that Bhagavan should always give him
the bliss of worship and the being protected by Bhagavan as a baby is
protected by its kind joy of mother and yet Bhagavan will not allow the devotee
to remain separated from Him for ever. Bhagavan raises the worship, per through
Salokyam.Sameepyamand Saroopyaminto Sayujyam. The Jiva's soul by divine grace
gets further and further refined till it regains the divine form. The dew drop
which came from the ocean but was resting as a separate entity for a while on a
lotus leaf resting on that ocean slips silently into the shining ocean and gets
absorbed in it. This is the ultimate sakshatkara experience. It is not the
seeing by one entity of another, either in the waking °u-m trance
state but the essence of such an experience. The object of seeing is knowing;
and in all literatures the verbs denoting seeing" are used to denote
knowing also even when the knowing has proceeded beyond the triputi stage
(involving the Knower, knowing and known as separate items). "Attnava
Are Urashtavyo Shrothavyo, Manthavyo Nidihyasi Thavyah" which means
the Atman has to be seen, heard (of), meditated
upon, and dwelt upon with concentration in
the heart, appli equally whether the Atman is the individual Jivatman or t
Paramatman. In fact the object of meditation and concentrati is the blissful
perception of the unity or the identity of the two which is the highest
Sakshathkara ever known. Every one neo sarily begins his contact with the
divine, adopting the Sagu form and then intensity of effort (tapas and
dhyan&m) ensui Sakshathkara or seeing of the divine form with, a glow of j
overpowering the heart and producing ashtabava, that is, tears joy, horripilation,
etc. And the experience of almost everyo seems to show that the course is not
ended with that but with t further and final experience where the soul (Jiva)
is lost in Bli Divine and returns no longer therefrom. That is Shanti—Peat
That is the End.
SAI SAKSHATHKARA
As Sakshathkara has been defined as chamatkaric, i. super
human or "super natural" appearance of a divine form, th« must be
innumerable instances of Sri Sai Baba's Sakshatkara, only during the forty or
fifty years of his close touch
with p( pie at Shirdi (upto 1918) but also in the three decades thereaft
Hundreds of devotees have experienced it.
Hundreds or th( ands more wish
to have some of their own on the same line.
It may be observed at the outset that the
sudden appearai of Baba in some place and at
sometime in some unaccounta! way (which is termed SakshathkarJ is only
one of the num?rc siddhies mentioned in
the sastras and manifested by Sri Sai Bal Krishna and other great
souls. These acts
just like ptl chamatkaric and non-chamatkaric acts
of Sri Sai Baba, in respi of motive, purpose and even utility. Only perhaps, the Chamj karic nature of
the appearance would serve to impress
the obi vers more forcibly and vividly and eradicate doubt and want faith. On the whole, we have to remember in studying Sai S shathkaras that they are only part of the
innumerable manifes tions of the Sai Spirit.
A study of Baba's life especially throi Baba's Charters and Sayings
will teach and impress us
with that is necessary for our
temporal and spiritual welfare ;
an< study or analysis of these sakshathkaras as a part of the previoi
mentioned study must be made with the same object.
The entire life of Sri Sai Baba was one
whole mission for m uplift of
humanity and especially for the benefit of those vrl had previous
rinanubandha relations with him. Baba's appet ences were generally to infuse
faith, courage and hope or other active help,—help in matters temporal and
spiritual. Al
al help naturally tended to and culminated
in the highest al benefits the recipient was capable of. Any appearance SP!Thelp
from Baba would naturally promote these ends. And f. eerns to have
selected chamatkaric appearance and chamat-t ic help as specially fitted to
achieve these objects in special Let us proceed to consider a lew of
these sakshatkaras
*
_
in this article.
Baba's devotees regarded him as their
guardian angel or Mother dear watching them both night and day and in all
places especially in times of risk and danger to secure their welfare. Sri Sai
Baba openly declared this to be his mission and position in ever memorable
words. Said He " Be wherever you may, speak and do whatever you may ; be
assured that I am aware of all that at once." The instances we are narrating
below amply prove that he carried out his promise to the very letter.
People think of or feel the need for
Baba's help in times of trouble and distress, it is in time of special agony of
mind of the Bhakta that Baba appears in sakshatkara before him, just as it was
in Droupadhi's great despair and agony in Duryodhana's court hall that Sri
Krishna afforded her chamatkaric relief by covering her with new dresses
whenever the old ones were pulled off in order to disgrace her. Rao Bahadur, S.
B. Dumal was in the operation theatre just about to undergo a very risky
operation and his thought naturally turned to Baba. In that crucial moment he
saw Baba appearing inside the theatre and next to his bed ; and he got greatly
emboldened and felt sure that he was safe in Baba's presence. Accordingly the
operation was safe and successful,
A devotee at Dhulia, Bahalkar by name, was
anxiously seated by the sick bed of his son at a time when doctors did not give
much encouragement or hope of recovery. He looked before him and found Baba had
suddenly appeared in the room in some mysterious manner. Baba applied Udhi to
the forehead of the patient and told the agonised father that the fever would
soon vanish and that the boy must be brought to him at Shirdi after recovery. (It
must be remembered that Baba never left Shirdi during the last thirty years or
so of his life and that his appear. ances at a distant place like Dhulia eighty
miles from Shirdi, and Jejuri I 50 miles from Shirdi were only chamatkaric
appearances which could not have been brought about by ordinary methods of
locomotion).
Sri R. B.
Furandare was once seriously ill and the situation was indeed so critical that
he saw fierce Yama Dutas close to him and starting their tortures. It looked as
though his life had piactically ended. But just at that juncture Sai Baba
appeared in the room, close to him. And taking his leg and hand in His
own palms Baba began to tend him and at
once the Yama Dut vanished; and fairly quickly Sri R. B. Purandare recovered health.
The best known instance of Krishna's
chamatkaric appei ance is the Visvarupa darsanam of the eleventh chapter of tj
Bhagavath Gita. When Bhagawan had assured Arjuna that he all the gods and
all creatures also, Arjuna replied that he doubt believed the statement to be
true. But in order that should realise it with full force he prayed for ocular
demonJ ration to be given to him of Bhagawan being in all the forms al all the
forms being in him, Krishna seated as he was on tj chariot suddenly transformed
himself into all that is and Arjui saw in that cousin's form the entire
universe including all tj gods and all other beings. Thus Arjuna derived an
indelit impression of everything being Bhagawan (Vasudevas Sarvaroj
Sat Baba with his sakshathkaric powers
dealt with numerol devotees and gave his sakshathkaras as being all the
gods—not] one time nor to one person nor in one all inclusive form,
A deputy collector devotee was practising
meditation at Bombay Lakshmi Narayana temple making the image therein object of
contemplation. For a long time he held that image in mind's eye and was
satisfied with the intensity of his concent^ tion. Suddenly the vision of
Lakshmi Narayana vanished and place was taken by the figure of Sri Sai Baba.
The devotee was'. wildered and dejected as he considered that his
concentration hj proved a failure. Subsequently he went to Shirdi and Baba as!
him there, what harm there was in Baba's figure appearing fore him instead of
Lakshmi Narayana. "Am I different fr< Lakshminarayana?" asked Baba.
The devotee then discover! that Baba's appearance at the sadhana in the
Lakshminarayaj temple was a part of Baba's plan to make the devotee feel Ba| is
God quite as much as Lakshminarayana.
Yasya Deve Para Bhaktih Yatha Deve Tatha
Gurow Tasyeithe Kathiia Hyarthah Prakasante Mahatmanah,
says the Upanishad and indicates that one
cannot realise the innermost secret of the Vedas namely the real nature of the
Atman until and unless one has very high and intense bhakti towards one's Ishta
murthi God and the same intense devotion towards one's Guru; in fact
identifying God with guru. Acharyadevo Bhavt is the vedic maxim, that
is, we must treat our guru as God. The devotee in this case must have thus
discovered that Baba brought in his chamatkaric appearance in the midst of his
yogasamadhi at the Bombay temple for the very purpose of improving and effectu-
11
ting the yoga samadhi. Thereafter Baba led the same devotee some fcfpandharpur he was afraid
that he would no longer be able to
me further steps onward in the same
direction. The devotee got 9°tomed to value Baba's darsan and
when he was transferred
see Baba as Shirdi is in the Ahmednagar
district and far away from Pandharpur. Baba reading his thought told him that
he might boldly go to Pandharpur and that Baba had already gone to Pandharpur
and would be there at the Deputy Collector's visit. When the latter went to
Vittal temple at pandharpur and entered it, he did not see the Vittal image
there i.e. the figure standing with arms akimbo, but saw in its place Sai
Baba's seated figure. Ao<Mie was happy to note the fulfilment of Baba's
promise. " After a short time the standing figure of Vittal appeared.
A South African Doctor of an orthodox
Brahmin type was brought to Dwarakamayee at Shirdi by his friend a Mamlatdar
and he declined to enter the premises which he considered to be detrimental to
his sacerdotal purity. Baba in his mercy wished to drive the bee from the
bonnet of this doctor. When puja was going on, this orthodox Brahmin rushed
through the crowd and fell prostrate at the feet of Baba repeating Ram Ram Ram.
The explanation he gave out for the change in his conduct was that while he was
gazing at Baba, the Baba form (of a golden hue) disappeared and in its place
he saw the dark figure of Sri Rama. He had for thirty years been anxious to get
Sakshatkara of Sri Rama and he had got it in the Dwarkamayee in this
extraordinary fashion. He was convinced that Sai was Rama and Rama was Sai.
Whereas this conviction had to be brought about by this chamatkaric appearance
in this doctor's case, myriads have now the same faith without such chamatkars
as a basis for their conclusion.
Baba did not stop with proving that Rama
and he are one but he proceeded further to deal with various other divine forms
current in Maharashtra such as Datta, Maruti, Vittal, Ganapati etc., and showed
that each of these is himself.
Baba convinced numerous devotees, of his
being their Ishta Devata Murthi by transforming himself into those Murthis.
Nana Saheb Nimonkar was at Shirdi on a Datta Jayanthi day and at the time when
Datta is said to have been born of Anasuya. Suddenly Baba had the Anasuya
Chaitanya and identifying himself with her at her labour pains complained of
severe pain in the belly and drove every one out of the mosque. Very soon {that
is at the hour of Datta's birth) he called out to all to re-enter the mosque,
Nana Nimonkar was one of the first to enter it. And ( he see there
on the gadi on the mattress of Baba ? Not
1» figure but
the rosy figure of a hesh born baby with three
heads. That figure vanished very quickly
and Baba was agaii seen in his usual form on the gadi. Nana Saheb Chandorkar'j
sammandhi was taken to see Sai Baba* But he did not care foS Baba at all and
thought if he was to go to any sacred place ij must be to see Datta. When he
looked at Baba, he was ast< nished to see that Baba had three Heads. By this
chamatkari* appearance, Baba impressed on this visitor the truth that Babj is
not different from Datta. Nana Saheb Nimonkar's son, police ofiicer was left at
Shirdi by his father to wait upon Baba for a few days. His son did not esteem
Baba highly but reverec Maruthi. As he went on looking at Baba, the letter's
humar body oi golden hue was transformed into the gray monkey bod] and monkey
face of Maruthi and he exclaimed "Here is Marutj Take darsan oi
Maruti" Sri R. B. Purandhare's mother anc wife accompanied him on a visit
to Shirdi, but the ladies weri anxious to go to Pandharpur to take darsan of
Vittoba RukmaJ there. Baba who knew their thoughts showed himself (only tc
them) as Vittoba and Rukmai. The ladies were happy to gei Vittal darsan at
Shirdi itself without the trouble of travelling u{ to Pandharpur. Baba however
asked the mother "When are yoi going to Pandharpur?'' She answered that Shirdi
itself was hei Pandharpur. In the words of Das Ganu, her answer may be renj
dered thus
" Shirdi Majhe Pandharpwa
Sai Baba Rama Vara " which
means Shirdi is mj Pandharpur and Sai Baba is my Vittal or Vishnu.
Avuthai, a Sai devotee whose Ganapati
image got brokei was doubting if she should repair it or replace it or choose
onl; one of her three objects of worship thereafter for worship and i so
whether it should be Sai Baba or Ganapati or Siva. Bab then gave her
Sakshatkara in her dream. She found that Bab, appeared before her with an
elephant's trunk attached to his fac (just like Ganapati). She was satisfied
thereby that Sai Bar-was really the same as Ganapati.
When Sri Sai Baba made use of his
Sakshatkura to show hi divine nature and forms to the devotees and especially
thenatun and form of their Ishta Murties, it was to enable them to feel anJ
realise their Acharya is God. What was the benefit of thai realisation ? Not
merely earthly benefits but also the highest spiritual benefits.
Baba's maternal love to the devotees
melts at the agony oj distress of his devotees and makes him to render help to
them t Sakshatkaric appearance as already stated. 1 wo more instance of
these may be given. Mahalsapathy went out on a long pilgrj mage to jejuri for
the annual celebration of Khandoba worsh? there. He and his party
carried Kavadis or Palkis all throuf*
13
the way. (that is 150 miles.) to Jejuri
from Shirdi. But when they reached Jejuri, plague was raging there.
Alarmed and deject-d Mahalsapathy like his fellows placed his Kavadi down and
sat listlessly leaning on the Kavadi, not knowing what to do. Suddenly he
fancied that some one was behind him and he turned and saw, it was Sai Baba.
Though that figure vanished at once, he felt that Baba was with him and his
group. Greatly encouraged by this Sakshatkara he finished his pilgrimage,
observing the usual forms of worship. When he returned to Shirdi, Baba informed
him that he had indeed come to Jejuri at that time to encourage them.
But the time at which devotees require
Baba's help (especially his appearance) very greatly is the death crisis. Just as Sri Krishna appeared
before Bheeshma and
was with him till the actual moment of death, so also Baba rendered similar help to a number of devotees. Three instances m^ry be selected, one from
Maharashtra and two from Madras. Kohojkar's father was on his sick bed. As
death was approaching Baba appeared in the sick room but was viaible only to
the patient and this appearance must» have led not merely to an Anayasana
Maranam, that is painless \\ death, but also to Sadgati.
Similar grace and help were accorded at
Madras in recent years to two lady devotees, namely, Mrs, T. V. Chellappa
Sastry and Mrs. B. Papiah Chettiar. The former appeared to be in sound health
and of strong build. There was nothing to suggest hatt death was near. But Baba
appeared m her dream for two days and evidently invited her to go to Him, She
suddenly lost consciousness in a day or two after that Sakshatkaric appearance
and her sons who were greatly distressed at the suddenness of her death had the
consolation that Baba had in a way prepared her for the end and that Baba after
giving her Anayasana Maranam would grant Sadgati, also, to her soul. Mrs. B.
P. Chettiar was ailing for 40 days or more during her last illness. Sri Sai
Baba then appeared to her in her own heart repeatedly. She some times asked
Baba for recovery of health. Baba merely smiled, gave his Asirvadha and
disappeared. Thus he prepared her to face the inevitable dissolution of her
body. As for her soul, he had taken charge of it. Subsequent to her passing
away, she gave, that is, her spirit gave a message to the disconsolate hus-•11
i* in*orming nim ^at Baba had taken her to
Swarga and was still looking after her.
Great as the
above aid on the spiritual side may appear still greater is the final help that
Baba renders. Baba as Samartha gadguru declared his identity with Sri Krishna
and said (see - * V s- 59.) to Uddhava that his teachings are those
embodied IJ> the 23 chapters of Bhagavatha XI Skanda and that
these could
be realised by
intensely concentrating on the same, sitting at h! feet (or close to his
portrait). We see in Chapter VII, that Si Krishna has declared all these
Sakshatkaras. all that is seen, thi is, all phenomena to be Maya manomaya. They
are the working of Parakriti through the mind and Indriyas. They are transiej
and do not endure for ever. It is only that which endures It ever that
is real. The real is God. Sakshatkaras or Mayai manifestaions of God are designed
to promote certain laudabl objects, but still are only the lower rungs in the
ladder. He wl wishes to rise to the full height of his spiritual stature must
Sakshatkaras aside and realise the highest teachings of Bal (B. C. S.
58-73,111-2} namely, I am Brflhman. Maim Alh Hum. and "You and I are
one". Differences are unreal, Khatopanished.) If one with all his might
and main works hiras< to perfect surrender at Baba's feet and makes
Atmanivedana thi is, allows his sense of Ego to be lost in the contemplation of
Bli (which constitutes Baba.) then he is a Siddha, a Kritartha. has attained
the end. He returns no more into Samsara.